Mr. Jamie Spears – father of singer Britney Spears – appeared on the street for the first time after undergoing amputation surgery.
Currently, Mr. Jamie Spears (71 years old) must move in a wheelchair and needs someone to constantly help him. Mr. Jamie is living in a mobile home parked next to a warehouse located in the town of Kentwood, Louisiana, USA. This warehouse is used to store Britney ‘s memorabilia .
Recently, Mr. Jamie appeared on the street. When moving from the car to the warehouse, he had to use a wheelchair and needed help from others. Mr. Jamie had to undergo amputation surgery last November.
In his old age, Mr. Jamie constantly had to go in and out of the hospital because of many health problems (Photo: New York Post).
His right leg had to be surgically amputated above the knee joint. According to an anonymous source, Mr. Jamie had knee replacement surgery, but post-operative problems occurred. Mr. Jamie suffered a serious infection and doctors were forced to perform amputation surgery.
Before coming to this final solution, Mr. Jamie had to undergo many surgeries but were unsuccessful. In his old age, Mr. Jamie constantly had to go in and out of the hospital because of many health problems.
Britney did not share anything about her biological father’s health status. Some anonymous sources said that Britney also has no intention of reconciling with her biological father after 13 years of him taking on the role of guardian over her work and life. Recently, Britney reconnected with her biological mother, Lynne Spears.
In 2022, one year after Britney Spears regained autonomy and self-determination over her personal life, Mr. Jamie went to the newspaper to confide his feelings.
Mr. Jamie Spears always affirmed that the 13 years of guardianship for Britney were to help her… survive (Photo: New York Post).
Mr. Jamie is still seen by the media and the public as a “villain” in Britney’s life story. He is suspected of profiteering from his daughter’s assets and has tried every way to strictly control Britney’s life at a harsh and cruel level.
These things were pointed out by Britney during the process of asking the court to remove the guardianship regime. Britney even threatened to take her biological father to court to make him pay for his cruel actions while being her guardian.But before or after, Mr. Jamie Spears always affirmed that 13 years of guardianship for Britney was to help her… survive. He believes that Britney actually had a period when she needed guardianship, so that her life could be controlled and returned to a state of balance.
Mr. Jamie also saw himself as the one who saved his daughter’s life from collapse and misery. However, during the process of Britney requesting to remove the guardianship regime applied to her life, Mr. Jamie became the target of attack from millions of fans who love Britney.
Mr. Jamie affirmed that he loved his daughter with both emotion and reason (Photo: New York Post).
Last year, Mr. Jamie said: ” Guardianship is the solution for my daughter to still be alive today. Guardianship was a necessary intervention to rescue Britney from poverty. The darkest part. It was also the guardianship regime that helped maintain a stable relationship between Britney and her two sons for a long time.”
Mr. Jamie admitted that there have been many very difficult times, his family life is definitely not a “rosy picture”. But he affirmed that guardianship was the right decision for Britney. The price to pay for that decision was that the relationship between father and daughter became worse, because he became the person who directly controlled his daughter’s work and life.
Mr. Jamie said he also had to go through a dark period when he became the target of attacks from the media and the public. Finally, Mr. Jamie affirmed: “I am the one who loved my daughter with both emotion and reason. What would Britney have done without guardianship during her darkest years?
Without me, Britney would probably be dead. The conservatorship is to protect Britney and Britney’s children. Without guardianship, Britney would not be able to regain balance in her life and would not be allowed by the court to share custody of the children with her ex-husband in the past years.”